[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":63},["ShallowReactive",2],{"artwork-hua-hui-tu-7-chen-chun-222568":3},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"dynasty":7,"author":8,"museum":9,"description":10,"tags":11,"thumbUrl":26,"material":27,"size":28,"collection":29,"collections":30,"showCount":31,"zanCount":32,"manualWeight":32,"mainColor":33,"tagLinks":34},222568,"hua-hui-tu-7-chen-chun-222568","花卉图7","明","陈淳","美国波士顿博物馆","此图册是陈淳晚年作品。卷尾自题“嘉靖庚子，余游玉山，过周氏六观草堂。主人出此册，具丹粉，欲图杂卉。留连累月，不觉盈帙，见者亦且以草本视之可也。道复志”。按照其生卒年推算， “嘉靖庚子” 陈淳应为58岁，此作亦为其是画风成熟之作。从其题跋可以得知陈淳游历数月，画作颇丰，认为此作为“草本”，可见其自觉并无刻意求工，描写大略而已。\n卷尾文彭题曰：“赵昌王友已无伦，更学徐熙更逼真。意到不论颜色似，笔端原有四时春。阅白阳杂花漫题。文彭。”充分体现了吴门花鸟画的文人雅趣，“意到不论颜色似”概括了文人写意的特征，而“漫题”也体现了题咏者的状态，反映出文人书画家的共同气质特点与审美追求。\n文人王穉登的题跋则突出了对陈淳花卉写生推崇与称赞。“写生贵在约略点染，天真烂如。不当以分葩计蕊为似，重丹叠翠为工。观此册陈道复先生所作，粉墨萧闲，意象自足，所谓千金骏骨，识者求之牝牡骊黄之外可也。”此段题跋强调了陈淳花卉写生最主要的特点，即约略点染，不求工细，而意象自足。\n卷尾的金农长跋也对陈淳“行笔绝无时蹊，设色亦未敷采炫目，画以意似而非以形似也”的风格进行梳理，论述了写意书写的源流。但这段题跋存在一些问题。其一，通篇书体较为拘谨，特别是每行末字，刻意缩减对齐，非常局促。其二，“后世临写纷纷，徒劳豪楮”中“豪”应为“毫”之误。此出自大文人之手，有些牵强。其三，“此册九叶，花草凡七，间以山水两帧。”所述并非此册，极有可能是将他处题跋移接此处所致。所以这段金农题字不足以为据，至于真伪原由的评断，是另外的话题。本文主要论及陈淳花卉写生的艺术特点，就不将此段金农的论述作为讨论的依据了。\n变化生动自然，是陈淳花卉写生的代表作。如果将此册置于陈淳传世花鸟画作品中做一纵向比对，可以发现其共性的特征集中体现在这件作品中，同时，这件作品还有一些不同于其他作品的独到之处，都统一在率意自足的书写风格之中。所以这件陈淳绘画风格成熟期的作品，总体来看，体现了陈淳如下几个方面的鲜明的艺术特点。",[12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25],"高清","名画","国画","书画","明代","写意","水墨","设色","花鸟","花卉","枝叶","枝干","花朵","写意花鸟","https:\u002F\u002Foss.chuangqi.store\u002Fthumbweb\u002F42c3b1556563313a1660bdbd2d2b3b30.jpg","纸本设色","32.5×57.3厘米","",[],85,0,"BDBDBD",[35,37,39,41,43,45,47,49,51,53,55,57,59,61],{"name":12,"slug":36},"gao-qing",{"name":13,"slug":38},"ming-hua",{"name":14,"slug":40},"guo-hua",{"name":15,"slug":42},"shu-hua",{"name":16,"slug":44},"ming-dai",{"name":17,"slug":46},"xie-yi",{"name":18,"slug":48},"shui-mo",{"name":19,"slug":50},"she-se",{"name":20,"slug":52},"hua-niao",{"name":21,"slug":54},"hua-hui",{"name":22,"slug":56},"zhi-ye",{"name":23,"slug":58},"zhi-gan",{"name":24,"slug":60},"hua-duo",{"name":25,"slug":62},"xie-yi-hua-niao",1777535399076]