[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":41},["ShallowReactive",2],{"artwork-hui-qing-xi-er-san-zu-lu-yi-ming-223877":3},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"dynasty":7,"author":8,"museum":9,"description":10,"tags":11,"thumbUrl":18,"material":19,"size":20,"collection":21,"collections":22,"showCount":23,"zanCount":24,"manualWeight":24,"mainColor":25,"tagLinks":26},223877,"hui-qing-xi-er-san-zu-lu-yi-ming-223877","灰青系耳三足炉","宋","佚名","藏地不详","“哥窑”名列宋代五大名窑，在陶瓷史上有举足轻重的地位。哥窑胎多紫黑色、铁黑色、也有黄褐色。釉为失透的乳浊釉，釉面泛一层酥光，釉色以炒米黄、灰青多见，釉面大小纹片结合。\n经染色后大纹片呈深褐色，小纹片为黄褐色，也称‘金丝铁线’“墨纹梅花片”“叶脉纹”‘文武片’等。这是传世哥窑的主要特征之一。器形有各式瓶、炉、尊、洗及碗、盆、碟等。多见仿古造型，底足制作不十分规整，釉面常见缩釉和棕眼。\n而《中国陶瓷史》这样叙述：\n造型有各式瓶、炉、洗、盘、罐等。论胎有厚薄之分，其胎质有瓷胎和砂胎两种，胎色有黑灰、深灰、浅灰、土黄多种色调，釉色也有粉青、月白、油灰、青黄各色。从时间上讲，这里应有早晚之别，从产地说也有恐非一个瓷窑的作品，情况是比较复杂的。\n记载“哥窑”的古文献主要有：元代的《至正直记》，明代的《格古要论》、《遵生八笺》，清代的《博物要览》以及明代的《浙江通志》等。但究竟哥窑窑址何在？性质如何?一直是陶瓷史研究中众说纷纭、悬而未决的问题。\n流传于世的“哥窑”经典器大多源自清宫旧藏，由于这批器物与古文献中的记载的“哥窑”特征不符，而且没有考古资料佐证，因而造成了中国陶瓷史上最大的悬疑。\n为区别于明、清文献中所记载得哥窑（龙泉章生一窑），宫中名为“哥窑”的传世品，后世鉴赏家称其为“传世哥窑”。",[7,12,13,14,15,16,17],"陶瓷","开片","灰青釉","三足","系耳","器","https:\u002F\u002Foss.chuangqi.store\u002Fthumbweb\u002F21312e58c371279aeab805c588ed3b94.jpg","未知","Xcm*Xcm","",[],1,0,"795548",[27,29,31,33,35,37,39],{"name":7,"slug":28},"song-670",{"name":12,"slug":30},"tao-ci",{"name":13,"slug":32},"kai-pian",{"name":14,"slug":34},"hui-qing-you-4304",{"name":15,"slug":36},"san-zu",{"name":16,"slug":38},"xi-er",{"name":17,"slug":40},"qi",1777535501762]