[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":41},["ShallowReactive",2],{"artwork-shi-qi-tie-wang-xi-zhi-221028":3},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"dynasty":7,"author":8,"museum":9,"description":10,"tags":11,"thumbUrl":18,"material":19,"size":20,"collection":21,"collections":22,"showCount":24,"zanCount":25,"manualWeight":26,"mainColor":27,"tagLinks":28},221028,"shi-qi-tie-wang-xi-zhi-221028","十七帖","晋","王羲之","日本京都国立博物馆","《十七帖》是王羲之草书代表作，因卷首由“十七”二字而得名。原墨迹早佚，现传世《十七帖》是刻本。唐张彦远“法书要录”记载了《十七帖》原墨迹的情况：“《十七帖》长一丈二尺，即贞观中内本也，一百七行，九百四十三字。是煊赫著名帖也。太宗皇帝购求二王书，大王书有三千纸，率以一丈二尺为卷，取其书迹与言语以类相从缀成卷。”\n此帖为一组书信，据考证是写给他朋友益州刺史周抚的。书写时间从永和三年到升平五年（公元347-361年），时间长达十四年之久，是研究王羲之生平和书法发展的重要资料。清人包世臣有“十七帖疏征”一文可以参考。\n此帖前人评价甚高。如宋黄伯思说：“此帖逸少书中龙也”。朱熹说“玩其笔意，从容衍裕，而气象超然，不与法缚，不求法脱。所谓一一从自己胸襟中流出者。”也有人认为此帖“笔法古质浑然，有篆籀遗意”。这些评价都很中肯。尤其说它们写的从容、不受法的拘束，好像从自己胸中自然流出一样，最为深刻准确。孙过庭曾说过：“子敬（王献之）已下，莫不鼓努为力，标置成体”，即王羲之以下，都是在写字时故意用力，故意要表现自己有自己的艺术风格，这样就反而失去书写时的自然之美了。这种对比式的评论，对书法欣赏很有启示。",[12,13,14,15,16,17],"高清","草书","书法","长卷","字帖","拓本","https:\u002F\u002Foss.chuangqi.store\u002Fthumbweb\u002F4981f2b1a02a1372ae9f32e7e1133e56.jpg","纸本墨拓","纵25.1厘米，横16.4厘米。","书法精选",[21,23],"碑帖精选",183,2,0,"37474F",[29,31,33,35,37,39],{"name":12,"slug":30},"gao-qing",{"name":13,"slug":32},"cao-shu",{"name":14,"slug":34},"shu-fa",{"name":15,"slug":36},"chang-juan",{"name":16,"slug":38},"zi-tie",{"name":17,"slug":40},"ta-ben",1777535394993]