[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":43},["ShallowReactive",2],{"artwork-yu-hou-tie-wang-xi-zhi-221038":3},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"dynasty":7,"author":8,"museum":9,"description":10,"tags":11,"thumbUrl":19,"material":20,"size":21,"collection":22,"collections":23,"showCount":25,"zanCount":26,"manualWeight":26,"mainColor":27,"tagLinks":28},221038,"yu-hou-tie-wang-xi-zhi-221038","雨后贴","晋","王羲之","北京故宫博物院","《雨后帖》页，晋，传晋王羲之书，纸本，行草，纵25.7厘米，横14.9厘米。\n释文：\n今日雨后未果奉状，想□能于言话，可定便得书问，永以为训。妙绝无已，当其使转。与都下□信，戴适过于□也。羲之。\n署款下一草押不识，又“禹民”二字题名。\n鉴藏印有 “世南”、“贞观”（画描墨印），以及“四代相印”（朱文，伪）、“志东奇玩”（朱文，伪）、“绍兴”（朱文联珠），清乾隆、嘉庆、宣统内府诸印。\n帖后有元邓文原，明董其昌题跋各一段，明邹之麟题跋两段。\n《雨后帖》传为王羲之所书的一通信札，所谈之事不可考，书字不够规范，个别字难于辨认。\n此帖最早见于清代安岐《墨缘汇观》：“雨后帖，草书，纸本，唐模，有‘世南’墨印。”今专家鉴定认为此帖并非王羲之亲书原迹，依据有三：一是此帖上清代以前的钤印中除“绍兴”外皆不真。书法确有沉雄古雅之气，但与《姨母》、《丧乱》诸帖和《兰亭序》对比相去甚远。二是从用纸分析，纸为深褐色带有细横帘纹的竹纸。而竹纸在晋代是没有的，宋苏轼《东坡志林》卷九曾云：“今人以竹为纸，亦古所无有也。”三是晋代的书写工具是实心笔，行笔时笔毫开叉而经常出现贼毫，然《雨后帖》则用兼毫笔，笔画既软又肥，字距之间笔势连带而出现牵丝，无一笔贼毫出现，因此不应为晋时所书。\n从此帖的墨色浓淡变化观察，与运笔的启收、顿挫转折的徐疾和用力相吻合，无勾摹痕迹，因此判断此帖应是古临本，书写年代在北宋至南宋绍兴以前。\n清《书画记》、《平生壮观》、《墨缘汇观续录》、《石渠宝笈初编》著录。",[12,13,14,15,16,17,18],"书法","行书","墨书","题跋","册","书画","墨笔","https:\u002F\u002Foss.chuangqi.store\u002Fthumbweb\u002F9c92ae95145c43b40bb395a52c884972.jpg","纸本，行草","纵25.7厘米，横14.9厘米","书法精选",[22,24],"碑帖精选",58,0,"F48FB1",[29,31,33,35,37,39,41],{"name":12,"slug":30},"shu-fa",{"name":13,"slug":32},"xing-shu",{"name":14,"slug":34},"mo-shu",{"name":15,"slug":36},"ti-ba",{"name":16,"slug":38},"ce",{"name":17,"slug":40},"shu-hua",{"name":18,"slug":42},"mo-bi",1777535403054]