[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":43},["ShallowReactive",2],{"artwork-zhi-jing-dao-shi-qi-shi-jun-chi-du-huang-ting-jian-227588":3},{"id":4,"slug":5,"title":6,"dynasty":7,"author":8,"museum":9,"description":10,"tags":11,"thumbUrl":20,"material":21,"size":21,"collection":21,"collections":22,"showCount":23,"zanCount":24,"manualWeight":24,"mainColor":25,"tagLinks":26},227588,"zhi-jing-dao-shi-qi-shi-jun-chi-du-huang-ting-jian-227588","致景道十七使君尺牍","宋","黄庭坚","藏地不详","此帖亦称“与景道使君书”。纸本，纵27.8、横47.4厘米。被《戏鸿堂法书》、《玉烟堂帖》、《海宁陈氏藏真帖》等丛帖收录。\n\n黄庭坚是北宋诗人、书法家，字鲁直，号涪翁，又号山谷道人。江西修水人。黄庭坚书法擅行草书，初师法周越，后上溯颜真卿、怀素，尤其得力于《瘗鹤铭》，用笔以侧险取势，纵横拗崛，自成一家。黄庭坚行书不及其草书艺术水准高，而行书小字似胜大字，当然这是见仁见智的看法。他的大字行书虽长枪大戟，气势很盛，但总觉含蓄不足，不及小字耐人寻味，比如这件尺牍，温文尔雅，收放自如，并不因字小而损气度。\n\n这件尺牍还是一件重要的书论短文：信中写“翰林苏子瞻书法娟秀，虽用墨太丰，而韵有余，于今为天下第一。余书不足学，学者辄笔（懦）无劲气。今乃舍子瞻而学余，未能择术也。”黄书与苏东坡书法比起来，确实是苏字更有韵致，当然这仅是指行书，而苏书用墨太丰，亦是小疵，黄曾戏言苏字“石压蛤蟆”，而苏反唇相讥黄字“死蛇挂树”，双方都提到了对方特点，同时也点到不足，而他们之间的调侃都是善意的，正因为这一点而成了千古佳话。",[12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19],"书画","书法","行书","墨笔","纸本","印章","尺牍","宋代","https:\u002F\u002Foss.chuangqi.store\u002Fthumbweb\u002F4dad10d747084894378b48a94630475a.jpg","",[],15,0,"BDBDBD",[27,29,31,33,35,37,39,41],{"name":12,"slug":28},"shu-hua",{"name":13,"slug":30},"shu-fa",{"name":14,"slug":32},"xing-shu",{"name":15,"slug":34},"mo-bi",{"name":16,"slug":36},"zhi-ben",{"name":17,"slug":38},"yin-zhang",{"name":18,"slug":40},"chi-du",{"name":19,"slug":42},"song-dai",1777535423325]